Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
929,859
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (South), New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-76(1), New Delhi & Ors. | Delhi High Court on Maintainability of Writ Petition Against Adverse ITAT Order under the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 116
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (South), New Delhi, filed writ petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging the income tax proceedings concerning the assessment years un...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs MakeMy Trip India Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Transfer Pricing Methodology under Section 92C, Rule 10B & Section 260A of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, MakeMy Trip India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the travel and tourism business and provided online travel solutions, including airline ticket bookings, hotel reservations, car rentals, and ...

Yum! Restaurants Asia Pte. Ltd. vs Deputy Director of Income Tax & Ors. | Reassessment under Section 148 Quashed for Want of Valid Approval under Section 151(2) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  1 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 192
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the reassessment notice dated 28 March 2012 issued under Section 148 seeking to reopen its assessment for AY 2005–06. The petitioner also challenged the order dated 25 Janua...

Jagdish Prasad Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Allowability of Enhanced Licence Fee as Accrued Liability under Section 37(1) & Reassessment under Sections 147/148 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 278
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The assessee, Jagdish Prasad Gupta, operated a petroleum storage depot on railway land under licence. Licence fee was repeatedly enhanced by the Railways from nominal rates ...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 vs M/s Times Internet Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Allowability of Business Expenditure After Sale of Business & Website Development Expenses as Revenue Expenditure (Section 37(1), Income Tax Act, 1961)

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Times Internet Ltd., had filed returns for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2008-09 and disclosed that certain business segments had been transferred or withdrawn from its operations. D...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Denso India Limited (Delhi High Court) – Scope of Rectification under Section 154 vis-à-vis Penalty under Section 271C for Non-Deduction of TDS on Expatriate Salary

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 112
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDenso India Limited, engaged in manufacturing operations in India, had expatriate technicians deputed from its Japanese parent company for services in India. These expatriate employees were paid salary...

Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) vs ESPN Software India Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Aggregation of Advertisement Airtime and Distribution Revenue for Arm’s Length Price Determination under Transfer Pricing Provisions

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the CaseESPN Software India Ltd. was engaged in two connected lines of business: Distribution of television channels Sale of advertisement airtime inventory For transfer pricing purposes, the...

CIT vs Renu Constructions Pvt. Ltd. & Ankit Gupta | Delhi High Court on Validity of Section 153C Proceedings – Seized Documents Must “Belong To” Assessee

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation was conducted in the BM Gupta Group cases. During the course of the search, certain documents were recovered by the Department. Based on these documents, notices under S...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–6, New Delhi vs Maruti Suzuki India Limited (Successor of Suzuki Powertrain India Ltd.) | Assessment on Non-Existent Entity after Amalgamation Invalid under Section 170(2) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 137
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2011–12. The original return was filed by Suzuki Powertrain India Ltd. (SPIL), whi...