Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
917,315
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Pawan Kumar Aggarwal vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Rectification of STT Rebate Error under Sections 154, 143(1) & 88E of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Pawan Kumar Aggarwal, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2008–09 and declared total income of approximately ₹34.56 lakhs. While filing the return, the assessee had paid S...

Cheil India Private Limited (Formerly Cheil Communications India Pvt. Ltd.) vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Taxability of Advance Receipts and Revenue Recognition under Accounting Standard-9 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseDuring Assessment Year 2008–09, the assessee, Cheil India Private Limited, received a sum of ₹1,66,99,360 from Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunication India Pvt. Ltd...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-II vs. Smt. Kusum Gupta – Separate Investment and Trading Portfolios: Long-Term Capital Gain Cannot Be Treated as Business Income | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed her income tax return for Assessment Year 2007–08 declaring income of ₹6,16,070 and claimed an amount of ₹70,77,375 as Long-Term Capital Gain exempt under Section 10(38) of the...

Naresh Kumar Verma vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XII & Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Eligibility of Section 10B Deduction on Deemed Export Transactions and Penalty Proceedings | Delhi High Court (2014)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Naresh Kumar Verma, claimed benefit under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The claim was made on the basis that certain transactions qualified as "deem...

Naresh Kumar Verma vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XII & Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Eligibility of Section 10B Deduction on Deemed Export Transactions and Penalty Proceedings | Delhi High Court (2014)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Naresh Kumar Verma, claimed benefit under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The claim was made on the basis that certain transactions qualified as "deem...

Naresh Kumar Verma vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XII & Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, 0043ircle 35(1) – Eligibility of Section 10B Deduction, Deemed Export Claim and Penalty Proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Naresh Kumar Verma, claimed deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act on the basis of transactions asserted to qualify as exports/deemed exports under the applicable EXIM Policy. ...

M/s Jyoti Pershad Jagan Nath vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-X – Amnesty Scheme Benefit under Sections 271(1)(c), 273(2) & 263 of Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed returns for Assessment Year 1983-84 on 26.12.1983 and the assessment was completed thereafter. Following completion of assessment, the Income Tax authorities introduced the Amnesty S...

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-III vs. Sh. Gopal Gupta – Scope of Judicial Review over Settlement Commission Orders under Sections 245C, 245D(4) & 245-I of the Income Tax Act concerning Full and True Disclosure of Income and Interpretation of Cash Receipts

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Income Tax filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 21.05.2012 and subsequent order dated 20.11.2012 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission under Section 245D(4) of...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-1) & Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-III vs V.K. Bhatnagar – Delhi High Court on Block Assessment, Undisclosed Income, Telescoping Principle, Search & Seizure Additions under Sections 158BC and 260A of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 87
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSearch and seizure operations were conducted on 15.01.1999 at the residential premises of the assessee and at the school premises belonging to Bhatnagar School. During the course of the search, certain...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-1) & Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-III vs. V.K. Bhatnagar | Delhi High Court on Block Assessment, Telescoping of Income, Search & Seizure Additions under Sections 158BC and 260A of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 86
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSearch and seizure operations were conducted at the residence of V.K. Bhatnagar and school premises belonging to Bhatnagar School on 15.01.1999. During the search proceedings, cash and certain incrimin...