Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
911,797
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Krishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Additional Commissioner of Income Tax | Section 80-I Deduction on Service Charges from Heavy WaterPlant | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
Facts of the Case KRIBHCO operated an Ammonia/Urea Plant at Hazira. The Heavy Water Board established a Heavy Water Plant adjacent to KRIBHCO's premises under agreements executed between the parties. KRIBHCO ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-I) vs Jakson Ltd.: Analysis of Section 271(1)(c) Penalty on Deductions under Section 80-IB

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
 Facts of the Case:The appeals by the revenue arose from the common order dated 22.06.2012 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The disputes involved penalties und...

Krishak Bharti Cooperative Limited (KRIBHCO) vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Additional Commissioner of Income Tax – Eligibility of Service Charges for Deduction under Section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the Case KRIBHCO operated an Ammonia/Urea Plant at Hazira. Adjacent to KRIBHCO's plant, the Heavy Water Board established a Heavy Water Plant for manufacturing heavy water. KRIBHCO entered into agre...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Bhushan Capital & Credits Services Pvt Ltd – Disallowance of Loss on Sale of Shares under Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 260A

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 19.06.2009 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 967/DEL/...

Commissioner of Income Tax-V vs Quadrant Infotech India (P) Ltd. – Delhi High Court on Eligibility of Deduction for a New Industrial Undertaking and Distinction Between Reconstruction and Independent Unit under the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee established a new unit at Gurgaon within a technology park. Investments of approximately Rs. 1.19 crore were made toward electrical installations and plant and machinery. ...

Ester Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Delhi High Court Clarifies Bar on Raising Fresh MAT Computation Challenges at Appellate Stage under Sections 115JA and 115JAA of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 76
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Ester Industries Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1997–98 declaring nil taxable income under the normal provisions of the Income Tax Act. The assessee did not comput...

Ester Industries Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-IV | Whether MAT under Section 115JA Can Be Imposed Through Prima Facie Adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The assessee company filed its return for Assessment Year 1998–99 declaring "Nil" income and specifically stated that provisions of Section 115JA relating to MAT were not applicable. ...

Delhi HC in CIT vs. Kuldeep Sood: Rule of Consistency Prevails; No Block Assessment Addition u/s 158BC for Income Already Declared u/s 139(1) by Spouse

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the Case:1.      1.      The Search Action: A search and seizure operation was conducted by the Income Tax Department on both the business and residential premis...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI vs Yoshio Kubo & Connected Matters – Taxability of Employer-Borne Taxes, Social Security Contributions, Hypothetical Tax and Non-Monetary Perquisites under Sections 10(10CC), 17(2) & 195A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals involved expatriate employees working in India whose employers implemented tax equalization arrangements. Under these arrangements, employers assumed the actual Indian tax burden while ded...

Delhi HC in Maruti Suzuki: Coercive Recovery Barred; ITAT Cannot Ignore Prima Facie Case While Granting Stay of Demand u/s 220(6)

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe writ petition challenged the order dated 11.01.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Stay No. 310/Del/2012 related to assessment year 2008-09. The petitioner sought a stay on...