Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 2
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Replika Press Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Reopening U/s 147 Based on Audit Party’s Interpretation of Section 10B Is an Impermissible Change of Opinion
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Replika Press Private Limited, operates a 100% export-oriented
unit (EOU) engaged in manufacturing and exporting printed books.
The
petitioner filed its return of ...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhinav Kumar Mittal: Valid Material Found During Search is a Condition Precedent for DVO Reference Under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Return: The respondent/assessee filed his original
return of income for the Assessment Year 2006-07 on July 18, 2006,
declaring a total income of ₹39,90,410/-.
Search
...
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax: Validity of Reopening Assessment Under Section 147/148 Beyond Four Years Based on Audit Memos and Alleged Change of Opinion
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., challenged a notice dated
29.03.2010 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The
notice proposed to re-open the assessment...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharti Airtel Limited: Delhi High Court Ruling on Limitation Period for Revision under Section 263(2)
Facts
of the Case·
Assessment Year: The appeal by the Revenue pertained to the
Assessment Year 2005-06. ·
Original
As...
Shivalik Bimetal Controls Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer : Validity of Reopening Notice under Section 148 Beyond 4 Years Without Failure to Disclose Material Facts
Facts of the Case
For
the Assessment Year (AY) 2005-06, the initial assessment of the
petitioner, Shivalik Bimetal Controls Ltd., was completed under Section
143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on Apr...
M/s Lord Chloro Alkalies Ltd. vs Director General of Income Tax (Admn.) & Anr. – Delhi High Court | Validity of BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme for Waiver of Interest under Income Tax Act vis-à-vis SICA, Sections 32, 22 and Section 119 of Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseM/s Lord Chloro Alkalies Ltd., originally incorporated as Modi
Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd., commenced production of caustic soda and
initially operated satisfactorily. Subsequently, owing to adverse ...
Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax | Applicability of Section 43B on Cess and Surcharge
Facts of the Case:·
The assessee claimed an expenditure
of Rs. 1,45,29,207 for the assessment year (AY) 1985-86 as an accrued liability
to pay cess and cess surcharge u...
Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Sapient Corporation Pvt Ltd | Disallowance of Leave Encashment under Section 43B
Facts of the Case·
The respondent-assessee, Sapient
Corporation Pvt Ltd, faced reassessment proceedings for the Assessment Year
2004-05. · ...
AAA Portfolios Pvt. Ltd. & Others vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Others – Delhi High Court on Validity of Recovery Proceedings Under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act in Respect of Escrow Funds (2013)
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners were shareholders of Escorts Heart
Institute & Research Centre Ltd. and had entered into a Share Purchase
Agreement dated 25.09.2005 with Fortis Healthcare Ltd. for sale of their
...
Khanna and Annadhanam vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Capital vs Revenue Receipt – Analysis under Section 260A, Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
The assessee, a firm of chartered accountants, received referred
work from M/s Gupta Chaudhary & Ghose, Calcutta, initially referred by
Deloitte Haskins & Sells (“DHS”), an in...