Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
911,795
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. McDONALDS CORPORATION: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 147/148 Based on a Mere Change of Opinion Where Primary Facts Were Fully Disclosed

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 75
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Arrangement: The assessee, McDonalds Corporation (USA), entered into a Master Licensing Agreement (MLA) on January 1, 1996, with McDonalds India Private Limited (MIPL). Under thi...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Samsung India Electronics Ltd. – Defective Stock Valuation under Section 115JA and Allowability of Employee Training Expenses | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Samsung India Electronics Ltd., had written off defective stock amounting to Rs.1,20,07,908/- by valuing it at realizable market value, which was lower than the cost p...

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Intercontinental Trading & Investment Co. Ltd. (On the Mandatory Requirement of Recording Satisfaction for Assuming Jurisdiction Under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961)

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the Case Search and Seizure: A search operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was conducted on November 22, 1996, at the premises of M/s Hindustan Development Corporation Lim...

JD Tytler School Society vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemption) & Anr. — Remand of Exemption Claims Under Section 10(23C)(vi) Following Post-Order Amendment of Memorandum of Association

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the Case Parties Involved: The petitioner is the JD Tytler School Society , and the respondents are the Director General of Income Tax (Exemption) and others. Impugned Orders: The pe...

Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Avinash Jain: Revenue Cannot Recharacterize Capital Gains into Business Income Where Assessee Maintains Distinct Dual Share Portfolios Consistent with Historical Practice and CBDT Circular No. 4/2007

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 82
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee (Avinash Jain) was engaged in the sale and purchase of shares. The Assessee consistently maintained two distinct separate portfolios: an investment portfolio (compris...

Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Nahar Theaters: De Novo Remand under Section 254 due to ITAT’s Failure to Verify Record Status of Critical 2002 MOU, While Sustaining the Finality of Annual Letting Value under Sections 22 and 23

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 76
Read More »
Facts of the Case This case involves three interconnected appeals filed by the Revenue, namely ITA 845/2009, ITA 909/2009, and ITA 1409/2010. The underlying appeals pertain to the Assessment Years ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs DLF Commercial Developers Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Derivative Trading Loss, Speculative Loss and Applicability of Explanation to Section 73 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, DLF Commercial Developers Ltd., claimed a loss of approximately ₹492.71 lakhs arising from purchase and sale transactions involving derivatives. The assessee contended that such derivat...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs DLF Commercial Developers Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Derivative Trading Loss, Speculative Loss and Applicability of Explanation to Section 73 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, DLF Commercial Developers Ltd., claimed a loss of approximately ₹492.71 lakhs arising from purchase and sale transactions involving derivatives. The assessee contended that such derivat...

Rambagh Palace Hotels Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax: Validity of Reassessment Under Section 147/148 Based on Third-Party Corporate Complaint.

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee Background: The petitioner, M/s Rambagh Palace Hotels Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in running multiple luxury hotel units. Original Assessments: ...

Delhi HC in CIT vs. Nahar Theaters: High Court Orders De Novo Remand under Section 254 due to ITAT’s Failure to Verify Critical Evidentiary MOU, While Protecting Finality of Annual Letting Value

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department (Appellant) filed three appeals—ITA No. 845/2009, ITA No. 909/2009, and ITA No. 1409/2010—before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. These appeals challenged the Income Tax Appe...