Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax | Taxability of Unsold Flats Held as Stock-in-Trade under Sections 22 & 23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in the business of real
estate development and construction, had completed certain residential and
commercial units which remained unsold and continued to be reflected as
s...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Denso India Limited | Delhi High Court on Scope of Rectification under Section 154 and Penalty under Section 271C of Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseDenso India Limited engaged expatriate technicians deputed
by its parent company in Japan for its manufacturing operations in India. The
Indian entity paid salary in India and provided accommodation, w...
Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax | Taxability of Unsold Flats Held as Stock-in-Trade under Sections 22 & 23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in the business of
construction and sale of residential and commercial properties, retained
certain flats as unsold inventory (stock-in-trade). These properties remained
in its p...
CIT vs Renu Constructions Pvt. Ltd. & Ankit Gupta | Delhi High Court on Validity of Section 153C Proceedings and Requirement of “Belonging To” Seized Documents under Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of appeals arose from search and
seizure operations conducted in the BM Gupta Group cases. During the
course of the search, certain documents were seized by the Department. Based on
...
Taxability of Non-Compete Fee Received on Retirement – Whether Non-Compete Compensation Constitutes Capital Receipt or Revenue Receipt under Section 28(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-Assessee, Mrs. Tara Sinha, was serving
as the President of Tara Sinha McCann Erickson Pvt. Ltd. (TSME), a leading
advertising agency, and held 51% shareholding in the company. During
As...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Denso India Limited (Delhi High Court) – Scope of Rectification under Section 154 vis-à-vis Review of Appellate Order and Penalty under Section 271C for Failure to Deduct TDS on Expatriate Salary
Facts of the CaseDenso India Limited, engaged in manufacturing operations,
had expatriate technicians deputed from its Japanese parent entity. These
employees received salary partly in India and partly in Japan.During ...
Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (South), New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-76(1), New Delhi & Ors. | Delhi High Court on Maintainability of Writ Petition Against ITAT Order
Facts of the
CaseThe Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (South),
New Delhi, instituted multiple writ petitions before the Delhi High Court
against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and other respondents
...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 vs Indrapuram Habitat Centre Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Validity of Project Completion Method under Section 145 of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, a builder and developer
engaged in construction projects including commercial buildings, had
consistently followed the Project Completion Method for recognizing
revenue. Durin...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Denso India Limited (Delhi High Court) – Scope of Rectification under Section 154 vis-à-vis Penalty under Section 271C for Non-Deduction of TDS on Expatriate Salary
Facts of the CaseDenso India Limited, engaged in manufacturing operations,
had expatriate technicians deputed by its Japanese parent company for work in
India. During the relevant financial years, a portion of the sala...
Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. | Delhi High Court on Scope of “Full and True Disclosure” under Sections 245C(1) and 245D(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Private Limited,
was a subsidiary of the Norway-based Telenor Group. Pursuant to a Business
Transfer Agreement, its telecom business was transferred ...