Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. AKS Farms Pvt. Ltd.: Analysis of Mutual Fund Trading Loss and Taxability of Gifts Under the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Appellant) challenged an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had granted relief to the Assessee, AKS Farms Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent). The primary disputes involved ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Smt. Bela Jain: Assessment Reopening Based on Retracted Statement under Section 147/148 of the Income-Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring a search operation conducted in February 1995 on the residential premises of the assessee and the Big Jo’s Group, a statement was recorded from the assessee under Section 132(4) of the Income-...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Modipon Ltd.: Deletion of Disallowance on Bad Debts Written Off Under Section 36(1)(vii) and the Exclusion of Provision for Doubtful Debts from Book Profits Under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Modipon Ltd., filed its income tax return claiming deductions for certain amounts written off as bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ...

Jurisdiction and Validity of Reassessment Notices: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sh. Ranjeet Singh [2010:DHC:9693-DB]

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, a resident of Delhi, regularly filed income tax returns with the DCIT, Circle 21(2), Delhi. The assessee owned land in Ghaziabad, which was acquired by the authorities, resulti...

Jurisdiction and Procedural Validity of Reopening Assessments: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sh. Ranjeet Singh (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee was a regular taxpayer assessed under the jurisdiction of the DCIT, Circle 21(2), New Delhi. The Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward-2(2), Ghaziabad, issued a notice to the assessee ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Bina Gupta Scope of Section 37(1) vs Section 43(5) on Business Damages and Interest Disallowance: Delhi High Court Clarifies ITAT’s Remand Powers

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant assessee was engaged in the business of importing pulses and PVC resins and making sales on a wholesale basis. During the relevant assessment year (A.Y. 2007-08), the appellant entered in...

Interpretation of Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Vistar Construction Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the Assessment Year 2004-2005. The respondent, M/s Vistar Construction ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. J.J. Jindal Infin Pvt. Ltd.: Delhi High Court Ruling on Section 68 and Share Application Money

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The Assessing Officer (AO) had made an addition of...

Jurisprudential Analysis: Burden of Proof and Addition of Share Application Money under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act – Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Derby Overseas P. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-Assessee, Derby Overseas P. Ltd., received share application money during the Assessment Years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. The Assessing Officer (AO), relying on the statement of a third pa...

Comprehensive Analysis of The Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) vs. Nestle India Ltd.: Defining the Boundaries of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c)

Author
My Tax Expert
10/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) initiated an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to challenge an order issued by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on November 6, 2009. Th...