Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Director of Income Tax vs. Galileo International Inc. & Connected Appeals – Delhi High Court Reaffirms Earlier Precedent; Revenue Appeals Dismissed

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court. The principal issue raised in these appeals had already been examined and decided by the Delhi High Court in Director of ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. SIL Investments Ltd. | Reassessment under Section 147 Cannot Be Reopened Beyond Four Years Solely Due to Retrospective Amendment to Section 80HHC – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, SIL Investments Ltd., had filed its income tax returns and the assessments were originally completed under the provisions of the Income-tax Act.Subsequently, Section 80HHC was amended r...

CIT vs M/s Vardhman Industries Ltd – Income Tax Appeal under Section 194 of the IT Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appeals were filed by the Income Tax Department (Revenue) against a group of assessees, including Ravi Dass Garg. The dispute arose from additions made by the Assessing O...

Director of Income Tax vs. Galileo International Inc. | Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Following Binding Precedent | ITA Nos. 900, 901, 902, 903, 904 & 905 of 2008

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case1.      The Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court being ITA Nos. 900, 901, 902, 903, 904 and 905 of 2008.2.      During th...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sahara India Mass Communication: Deletion of Income Tax Additions on Account of Excessive Newsprint Wastage Book Results and Admission of Additional Ground of Expenditure

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The assessee, M/s Sahara India Mass Communication, filed its original return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 1994-95, declaring a loss of ₹...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri Naresh Kumar Aggarwala (Delhi High Court) – Seized Fax Message Held Sufficient Evidence of Undisclosed Investment; Presumption under Section 132(4A) Upheld

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee was engaged in stock broking and other income-generating activities. A survey was conducted on 16.10.1992 followed by a search operation on 23.10.1992, during which certain do...

Commissioner/Director of Income Tax (Revenue) vs. Assessee (Respondent) – Following Director of Income Tax vs. Galileo International Inc. [224 CTR 251]

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court raising issues concerning the taxability of income in India. The controversy involved questions that had already been adjudicated by ...

Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts v. DGIT (Exemptions) | Section 10(23C)(iv) Exemption Denied For Violation of Section 11(5) Rectified Post High Court Intervention – Landmark Delhi High Court Ruling on Retrospective Compliance of Revised Applications

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The petitioner, Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts, applied for a tax exemption under Section $10(23C)(iv)$ of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. K.P. Verghese - Addition Based Solely on DVO Valuation Report Cannot Be Sustained Without Independent Evidence | Section 69 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed the return of income for Assessment Year 2005-06. The assessee disclosed the purchase cost of a property at ₹6,00,000 as recorded in the sale deed and books of...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Winstral Petrochemicals Pvt Ltd | Section 68 Income Tax Act – Deletion of Unexplained Cash Credit on Share Application Money Received via Banking Channels

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The Assessee company filed its income tax return for the Assessment Year 2004-05 declaring an income of ₹2,20,880. The case was initially processe...