GST ITC Cannot Be Denied Due to Suo Moto Retrospective Cancellation of Supplier’s Registration When Buyer Is Bona Fide – Calcutta High Court | M/s Gargo Traders v. Joint Commissioner, State Tax

Author
My Tax Expert
22/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 509
Read More »
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI (Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction) APPELLATE SIDEPresent: The Hon’ble Justice Krishna RaoWPA 1009 of 2022M/s. Gargo Traders Versus The Joint Commissioner,...

Separate GST Registration for Warehouses – Mandatory or Not? Detailed Analysis with AAR Maharashtra Ruling in Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Ltd. under CGST & IGST Acts

Author
CA. VAIBHAV RAI
21/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 433
Read More »
 Whether separate GST Registration is required for a warehouse?Getting registered under GST is the pre-eminent step for embarking on the journey of doing business. The registration under GST is compulsory...

Accumulation u/s 11(2) Cannot Be Denied for Vague Form 10 If Purpose Aligns With Trust Objects: Mumbai ITAT | Harmony Foundation v. ITO (Exemption) [TS-1673-ITAT-2025]

Author
My Tax Expert
21/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 345
Read More »
Accumulation under section 11(2) cannot be denied for vague Form 10 if purpose aligns with Trust’s objectiveMumbai ITAT allows Assessee’s (Trust) appeal and holds that accumulation of income under Section 11(2) canno...

Key amendments in PFRDA (Exits and Withdrawals under the NPS) Regulations, 2015

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 364
Read More »
Ministry of FinanceKey amendments in PFRDA (Exits and Withdrawals under the NPS) Regulations, 2015Amendments primarily aimed at the non-government sector, also rationalize provisions for government sectorMeasures to prov...

Validity of Reopening of Assessment and Addition under Section 69 without Rejection of Books

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 403
Read More »
Validity of Reopening of Assessment and Addition under Section 69 without Rejection of Books M/s KDP Infrastructure Private Limited v. DCITITAT Delhi | ITA No. 1094/Del/2024 | Order dated 12 December 2025 1...

Alleged Bogus Purchases: Deletion vs Remand Depends on Charging Provision — ITAT Delhi Deletes Addition u/s 69, ITAT Pune Orders Remand u/s 37 | KDP Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Taparia Tools Ltd. (2025)

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 484
Read More »
Alleged Bogus Purchases – Divergent Legal Treatment Case 1:M/s KDP Infrastructure Private Limited v. DCITITAT Delhi | ITA No. 1094/Del/2024 | Order dated 12.12.2025 Case 2:ACIT, Circle-1 v. Taparia Tools ...

GAAR Not Applicable Without ‘Impermissible Avoidance Arrangement’: Telangana High Court Quashes GAAR Proceedings on Share Transactions | Smt. Anvida Bandi v. DCIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 726 (Telangana HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 311
Read More »
In recent judgement (September, 2025) Telangana High Court quashes GAAR proceedings in absence of an ‘impermissible avoidance arrangement’(IAA)In Smt. Anvida Bandi v Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, [2025] 177 taxm...

Foreign Tax Credit Allowed When Form 67 & Revised Return Filed in Time: Delhi ITAT Grants Relief u/s 90/91, Deletes s.69 & s.115BBE Additions | DCIT v. Malvinder Mohan Singh (ITAT Delhi, 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 328
Read More »
Directs Assessing Officer to grant relief under section 90/91 as Form No. 67 & revised return filed within stipulated time The case of the Assessee was taken in Limited Scrutiny on grounds of Double Taxation Relief ...

Section 43CB Mandates Percentage Completion Method for Real Estate Developers: Mumbai ITAT Confirms Additions | Faithfull Developers v. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai, 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 423
Read More »
Section 43CB percentage completion method mandatory for real estate business; Confirms additions Mumbai ITAT dismisses Assessee’s appeal observing that the CIT(A) rightly held that the provisions of Section 43CB is ap...

Supreme Court Allows Non-Compete Fee as Revenue Expenditure u/s 37(1); Reverses High Court View, Matters Remanded to ITAT | SC Ruling (19 Dec 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 394
Read More »
Non-compete fee allowable revenue expense under section 37(1); Reverses High Court ratio December 19, 2025Supreme Court reverses High Court judgment, holds that non-compete fee payment is allowable revenue expense under...