Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
M/s Boston Beverages Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Kingston Beverages & Ors. & Anr. (2014) – Delhi High Court on Territorial Jurisdiction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner company entered into an agreement with the
respondent firm and advanced money. In discharge of liability, the respondents
issued multiple post-dated cheques drawn on IDBI Bank, Hyderabad...
Lt. Col. Vijay Singh Sandhu vs Kingstar Entrepreneur Pvt. Ltd. | Section 11 Arbitration & Continuation of Interim Relief under Section 17 | Delhi High Court (2015)
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Lt. Col. Vijay Singh Sandhu, filed a
petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking
appointment of an Arbitrator. The matter was listed for hearing on 9...
Commissioner, GST (East), Delhi vs Vimla Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Section 35G Central Excise Act | CESTAT Findings Upheld – No Substantial Question of Law
Facts of the Case
Searches
were conducted on 21 September 2005 at the premises of Vimla
Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. and its Director.
During
the search, a panchnama was drawn and unaccounted copper ing...
Commissioner, GST (East), Delhi vs Vimla Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Rohit Agarwal (2017:DHC:8823-DB) – No Substantial Question of Law in Excise Duty Demand Based on Unreliable Evidence
Facts of the Case
The
Department conducted searches at the premises of Vimla Rolling Mills Pvt.
Ltd. and its director on 21 September 2005.
During
the search, unaccounted copper ingots and certain ...
Commissioner of Tax, GST Delhi East vs M/s Indian Railway Finance Corporation (2017) – No Penalty Under Section 78 in Absence of Intent to Evade Service Tax
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, M/s Indian Railway Finance Corporation, a
Government of India undertaking, was engaged in raising funds through various
modes including offshore borrowings for financing Indian Railways...
Radico Khaitan Limited vs Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Delhi (2018:DHC:4249-DB) – Scope of CESTAT Remand Powers under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Radico Khaitan Limited, was issued a show
cause notice alleging liability to pay service tax amounting to ₹1.37 crore for
services received from M/s Jefferies International Limited (JI...
Reliance Cable Industries vs Commissioner of GST (East) Delhi (2018) – Clandestine Removal, Duty Demand & Evidentiary Value of Diaries under Central Excise Act
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Reliance Cable Industries, is engaged in manufacturing
electrical wires and cables.
A
search and seizure operation was conducted on 08.08.2011 at its premises.
...
Reliance Cable Industries vs Commissioner of GST (East), Delhi (2018) – Clandestine Removal, Evidentiary Value of Diaries & Statements under Central Excise Law
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Reliance Cable Industries, is engaged in manufacturing
electrical wires and cables.
Search
and seizure operations were conducted on 08.08.2011, leading to
re...
Youngsters FC vs Football Delhi (DSA) | FAO No. 541/2018 | Delhi High Court | Interim Protection Under Section 9 Arbitration Act
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Youngsters FC, a football club and
permanent member of Football Delhi (DSA), was participating in football
competitions and was placed in the ‘A’ Division.An order dated 14.07.2018 (...
SPIEGEL VERLAG RUDOLF AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co. KG vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Freelance Journalist Held Employee | Illegal Termination | Delhi HC Judgment
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, a German publishing company, engaged Ms. Padma Rao as a
“freelance employee” under an agreement dated 9 April 1998.
The
agreement was renewed annually for 14 y...