Facts of the Case
The
petitioner company was registered under GST and operating in Delhi with
multiple units.
On 30
September 2020, DGST authorities conducted a search under Section
67 DGST A...
FACTS OF THE CASE
The
petitioner was a former director (2006–2008) and shareholder (14.33%) of
Milkfood Ltd.
She
received remuneration of ₹1.50 crore in FY 2019–2020 as a mentor/advisor.
T...
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, R.R. Distributors Pvt. Ltd., engaged in
trading of paper goods, migrated from the Delhi VAT regime to GST. As on the
appointed date, it possessed closing stock worth ₹7.44 crore and s...
Facts of the Case
Petitioners
were directors of M/s KMG Industrial Traders Pvt. Ltd.
GST
Department alleged wrongful ITC of ₹22.42 crores based on fake
invoices from non-genuine firms.
It
...
FACTS OF THE CASEThe petitioner, M/s R.J. Trading Co. (RJT), a registered GST
dealer engaged in the trading of cigarettes, challenged the legality of search
and seizure operations conducted by GST authorities.
RJT
...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner filed a refund application in Form RFD-01 seeking refund
of:
₹25,29,944/-
(CGST + SGST)
Despite
expiry of the statutory period of 60 days, the re...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner challenged:
Seizure
of ₹65 lakhs cash from the director’s residence during GST search
on 04.03.2021.
Recovery
of ₹94,65,316/- allegedly witho...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Tarun Jain, was a director of a company engaged in
solar equipment manufacturing.
Authorities
alleged that the company, along with multiple firms, was involved in ...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Wipro Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging
the legality and validity of Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, alleging it to
be arbitrary and bad in law.The petitioner also sought relief agains...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioners (tobacco manufacturers/exporters) were registered under GST
and engaged in manufacturing and export activities.
Multiple
search operations, summons, and investigat...