Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the order
passed under Section 148A(d) and the consequential notice issued under Section
148 of the Income Tax Act, both dated 15 July 2022 for Assessmen...
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, KRBL Limited, succeeded before the ITAT vide order
dated 09 May 2022.
ITAT
deleted all additions and allowed the appeal of the Petitioner.
Consequently,
t...
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging:
Assessment Order dated 03.03.2023 passed under Sections 147
read with 144B
Notice under Section 148A(b) dated 17.03.2022
Order under Section...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner
challenged the order dated 31.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 along with the consequential notice issued under Section
148 for Assessment Year 2019–20...
Facts of the
Case
The petitioner was issued notices dated 09.03.2023 for
Assessment Years 2013–14 to 2019–20, granting 30 days to
file returns.
Subsequently, notices dated 20.03.2023 under Section 1...
Facts of the
Case
The Petitioner filed a writ seeking refund of ₹35,63,56,882/-
along with interest arising from appeal effect order dated 05 April
2021.
Further, the Petitioner sought:
Additio...
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioner, KRBL Limited, filed a writ petition
seeking issuance of tax refunds along with applicable interest. The refund
arose pursuant to:
Appeal effect order dated 05 April 2021 passed follo...
Facts of the
CaseThe Income Tax Department filed an appeal seeking
restoration of the name of the respondent company which had been struck off by
the Registrar of Companies (RoC) due to non-filing of statutory returns...
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioner, AmbarNuj Finance and Investment
Pvt. Ltd., filed its return for AY 2017–18 declaring NIL income due to
business losses. During scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income
...
Facts of the
CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the
order dated 27.09.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The
dispute pertained to the deletion of disallowance amounting to ₹3,1...