Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
954,359
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K Jammu vs M/s R B Jodhamal and Co. Pvt. Ltd.: High Court Dismisses Central Excise Appeal as Squarely Covered by Leading Case M/s Narbada Industries (CEA No. 10/2020) and Connected Appeals

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu, preferred Central Excise Appeal No. 258/2022 before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu against M/s R B Jodhama...

Sheeba Rani vs M/s Grand Enterprises & Others – Tenant Must Deposit Entire Admitted Rent Arrears to Contest Appeal; No Set-Off Against Alleged Deposit Permissible Under Section 12(1) of Kerala Rent Control Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sheeba Rani, was the tenant and appellant in R.C.A. No. 4/2022 pending before the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam. An order of eviction had been passed against her by the Re...

Bharat Bhushan @ Ashu vs State of Punjab & Connected Cases — Sections 438 & 439 Cr.P.C. | Regular and Anticipatory Bail Denied in Alleged Foodgrain Transportation, Labour Cartage and Corruption Scam

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitions arose from FIR No. 11 dated 16.08.2022 registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, District Ludhiana, under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC and Sections 7, 8, 12 and 13(...

M/s ib Track Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Sudhendra Dhakanikote vs State of Karnataka & Another – Karnataka High Court Refuses to Quash FIR over Alleged Deliberate Switching-Off of RFID E-Seal Tamper Alerts; National Security Paramount | Sections 66C & 72A IT Act, Sections 406, 420 & 34 IPC and Section 482 CrPC

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s ib Track Solutions Pvt. Ltd., the first petitioner, was a company engaged in procuring and supplying electronic seals using Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology for exporters from India...

M/s Royal Enterprises vs Union of India & Others – Patna High Court Allows GST Demand of Rs. 1.33 Crore with Statutory Interest to Be Paid in Six Equal Installments; DRC-13 Bank Account Attachment and Third-Party Recovery Suspended | Section 80 and Section 79 of GST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Royal Enterprises, through its proprietor Pawan Kumar Mishra, approached the Patna High Court challenging coercive GST recovery proceedings initiated pursuant to a demand reflected in FORM GST DRC-...

Raja Mohammed vs District Collector & Ors. – Madras High Court Closes Article 226 Writ Challenge to Panchayat Order on House Tax Receipt After Withdrawal; Liberty Granted to Apply Before Appropriate Authority

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Raja Mohammed, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court by filing W.P.(MD) No. 21488 of 2022 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The respondents were: The ...

M/s Hariom Mines and Minerals vs Union of India & Ors. – Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Demand on Mining Royalty Following Sudarshan Lal Gupta Case; Declines Different View Despite Pending Supreme Court Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Hariom Mines and Minerals, through its partner Mr. Hemendra Kalal, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur challenging the impugned orders/notice issued by the respondent ...

M/s Singer India Limited vs M/s Planman HR Private Limited & Ors. – Delhi High Court Refers Commercial Payment Dispute to DIAC Arbitration; Arbitration Clause Cannot Be Invoked Against Former Directors/CEO Absent Privity of Contract | Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Singer India Limited, the petitioner, entered into an agreement dated 13 October 2015 with M/s Planman HR Private Limited for providing qualified, competent, reliable and experienced personnel to ...

Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu vs M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. – J&K and Ladakh High Court Dismisses Excise Appeal as Squarely Covered by 23 May 2022 Judgment in CEA No. 10/2020 and Connected Appeals

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu, filed CEA No. 262/2022 before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu against M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., IGC S...

Adonex Pharmaceutical Private Limited vs State of Bihar — GST Registration Restoration Application to Be Decided on Merits Without Limitation Bar Under Section 29 of GST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAdonex Pharmaceutical Private Limited approached the Patna High Court challenging the order-in-appeal dated 08.09.2022 passed in Appeal No. ARN-AD100822004755G by the Additional Commissioner of State ...