Asian Hotels Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax I, New Delhi (Delhi High Court) – Deduction on Renovation & Repair Expenses as Revenue Expenditure (AY 1996–97)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Asian Hotels Ltd., incurred expenditure amounting to ₹67,44,331 on renovation, refurbishment, and repairs related to its existing business operations. The Assessing Officer disallowed ...

Asian Hotels Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-I (Delhi High Court) – Allowability of Renovation & Replacement Expenses as Revenue Expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present case pertains to Assessment Year 1995–96, wherein the assessee, Asian Hotels Ltd., challenged the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the classification o...

M/s Asian Hotels Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-I (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Renovation & Repair Expenses: Capital vs Revenue under Section 37 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 83
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, M/s Asian Hotels Ltd., operated a five-star hotel (Hyatt Regency, Delhi). It undertook extensive renovation, refurbishment, and repair work after several years of operati...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 vs Standard Chartered Grindlays Pty Ltd (Delhi High Court) – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable When Quantum Additions Deleted

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for...

M/s Asian Hotels Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Section 37 | Renovation & Consultancy Expenses as Revenue Expenditure

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant/assessee, M/s Asian Hotels Ltd, incurred substantial expenditure on renovation, refurbishment, and repairs of its existing hotel property during the Assessment Year 1994–95. Additiona...

M/s Asian Hotels Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Deductibility of Renovation & Consultancy Expenses under Section 37 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, M/s Asian Hotels Ltd., incurred expenditure towards renovation, repair, and refurbishment of its existing hotel property.A sum of ₹11,00,000 was paid to Gherzi Eastern Ltd. (GEL) for...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs GE India Business Services Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Transfer Pricing Issues Covered by Rampgreen Solutions Case

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 24
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appeal was preferred by the Revenue against the ITAT order. The dispute relates to transfer pricing adjustments for AY 2009–10. The Revenue aimed to challenge the Tribunal’s findi...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs Fujitsu India Pvt. Ltd. – RPM vs TNMM in Transfer Pricing for Pure Distributor (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Fujitsu India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in distribution activities, purchasing goods from its associated enterprises (AEs) and reselling them in India without any value addition.The Transfe...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs Fujitsu India Private Limited (Delhi High Court) – Applicability of Resale Price Method (RPM) vs TNMM for ALP Determination under Sections 144C & 143(3)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case pertains to Assessment Years 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14, where the Assessing Officer passed orders under Section 144C read with Section 143(3). The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determine...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax–3 vs Fujitsu India Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 144C r/w 143(3) | Transfer Pricing – RPM vs TNMM for ALP Determination

Author
My Tax Expert
07/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter pertains to appeals filed by the Revenue against Fujitsu India Private Limited for Assessment Years 2011–12, 2012–13, and 2013–14.The Assessing Officer (AO) passed assessment ...