Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. R.M. Traders: Judicial Assessment on the Genuineness of Business Transactions and Validity of Block Assessment Additions under Section 158BC

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the CaseFollowing a search and seizure operation conducted at the respondent’s premises on July 21, 2004, the Revenue initiated proceedings for a block assessment covering the period from April 1, 1996, to M...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. [Respondent School] – Delhi High Court Rules That Revenue Department Cannot Challenge Exemption Under Sections 10(23C)(vi), 11, and 12 When Identical Prior Orders Were Unchallenged and Accepted

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent is an educational institution (school) that has historically enjoyed tax benefits and exemptions under Section 11, Section 12, and Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Ta...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. BLB Ltd.: Deductibility of SEBI Registration Fee on Actual Payment Basis Under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee's Business: The Respondent-Assessee is a public limited company engaged in buying and selling shares on its own account, acting as a share broker, and holding memberships in...

The Commissioner of Income Tax-XIII vs. Sh. Qimat Rai Garg (ITA No. 759/2010, 2010:DHC:11695-DB) Validity of Chapter XIV-B Block Assessments: Whether Undisclosed Income Can Be Computed Based on Post-Search Bank Enquiries Traced to an Assessee's Statement on Oath Under Section 132(4) in Light of the Finance Act, 2002 Retrospective Amendments.

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee is a Chartered Accountant and a director in multiple finance and hire-purchase companies. Following a search operation conducted on a third-party corporate...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Xansa India Ltd. — Deletion of Rs. 2.26 Crore Addition Affirmed as Foreign Exchange Reimbursements Were Duly Supported by Agreements, Debit Notes, and FIRCs Submitted During Assessment Under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 2.26 crores to the assessee's income. This addition was made by disallowing the sum claimed by the assessee as earnings in ...

M/s Great Eastern Exports v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Connected Appeals – Deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80IA/80IB Cannot Be Claimed on the Same Profits Twice | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSeveral appeals involving different assessees and the Revenue were heard together as they raised a common legal issue concerning deductions under Chapter VI-A of the Income-tax Act.The assessees had c...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Stellar Construction (P) Ltd. — Deletion of Section 68 Addition on Account of Share Application Money Where Identity and Capacity of Investors Stand Established and Confirmed via Prior Precedents

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions to the total income of the assessee under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The addition was made on the grounds that the assessee failed...

Achin Agarwal, Pradeep Agarwal, and Geeta Agarwal vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. — Writ Jurisdiction Challenge Under Article 226 Against Section 127 Transfer of Assessment Files from Delhi to Rajasthan and Admissibility of Mutual Extension of Time for Completion of Income Tax Assessments Pursuant to High Court Directives

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe individual Petitioners (Achin Agarwal, Pradeep Agarwal, and Geeta Agarwal) approached the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi by filing three separate civil writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s John Tinson & Co. (P) Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 275(1)(a) & 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act – Limitation for Penalty Proceedings After Fresh Assessment Order

Author
My Tax Expert
06/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s John Tinson & Co. (P) Ltd., filed its return for Assessment Year 1993-94 declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO), however, completed assessment under Section 143(3) and asses...