Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
M/s Kedia Trading vs State of Chhattisgarh & Union of India – Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Validity of Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022; State Competent to Regulate Molasses under Sections 8 & 62 of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, consisting of traders and manufacturers
dealing in molasses for non-intoxicant purposes such as cattle feed, gudakhu,
industrial products and other commercial uses, challenged the cons...
M/s Kedia Trading vs State of Chhattisgarh & Union of India – Chhattisgarh High Court Declares Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022 Unconstitutional for Non-Intoxicant Molasses Trade | Sections 8 & 62 of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 | Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 246 & 246A of the Constitution of India
Facts of the Case
The
petitioners were engaged in the purchase, storage and sale of molasses for
non-intoxicant purposes including cattle feed, gudakhu and other
industrial applications.
The
S...
M/s Kedia Trading vs State of Chhattisgarh & Union of India – Chhattisgarh High Court Declares Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022 Ultra Vires the Constitution; Excise Licence Cannot Be Mandated for Non-Intoxicant Molasses Trade – Sections 8 & 62 of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, including M/s Kedia Trading and several
other traders and manufacturers, challenged the constitutional validity of the
Chhattisgarh Molasses Control and Regulation Rules, 2022. The pet...
Marysadan Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Kerala & Others – Kerala High Court Directs Immediate Upload of PWD Bills Through PRICE Software Due to GST Revision Without Affecting Contractor's Seniority | W.P.(C) No. 28841 of 2022
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Marysadan Projects Pvt. Ltd., executed
road construction and flood rectification works under contracts awarded by the
Kerala Public Works Department (PWD). After successfully comp...
M/S. New Grand Hotel, Rep. by Its Proprietor, H. Basheer & Another vs Shenbagam – Madras High Court Condones 1,598 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Against Employees Compensation Award Subject to Withdrawal of 50% Deposited Compensation | Employees' Compensation Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, M/s.
New Grand Hotel represented by its Proprietor and Manager, sought
condonation of a delay of 1,598 days in filing an appeal against the
award dated 28.08.2015 passed by the Deput...
M/s Kuldip Enterprises, Faridabad vs Union of India & Others – Punjab & Haryana High Court Disposes GST Transitional Input Tax Credit (TRAN-1/TRAN-2) Petition in View of Supreme Court's Filco Trade Centre Directions under Section 140 of the CGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Kuldip Enterprises, Faridabad,
approached the Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking relief regarding the
availment of transitional Input Tax Credit under the GST regime through
f...
Ajay Choudhary & Others vs Ranchi Municipal Corporation & Others – Jharkhand High Court Quashes Cancellation of Street Vendor Shop Allotments for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Speaking Order | Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 | Clause 10 of the Letters Patent
Facts of the
CaseThe appellants
were street vendors engaged in the sale of fish, chicken and other commodities
in the Khadgarha Market area of Ranchi. Several vendors possessed licences
issued under the Ranchi Munici...
State of Assam & Anr. vs. Lalhruaizela – Gauhati High Court Holds That Custody (Zimma) of Seized Property Cannot Be Granted During Investigation Under Section 451 CrPC; Directs Auction of Perishable Seized Areca Nuts
Facts of the CaseThe case arose from the seizure of 530 bags of areca nuts
(betel nuts) suspected to be of foreign origin during investigation of Badarpur
GRPS Case No. 33/2022.According to the prosecution, police rece...
M/s Bitumon Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds GST Detention and Penalty Disputes Under Section 129 Must Be Challenged Through Statutory Appeal Under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s Bitumon Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in
the business of importing and supplying bitumen products across India.
A
consignment of Bitumen Grade VG-30 w...
M/s Nippon Engineering Corporation, Faridabad vs Union of India & Others – Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Supreme Court's Filco Trade Centre Directions Allowing Fresh/Revised TRAN-1 & TRAN-2 Filing for Transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Nippon Engineering Corporation,
Faridabad, had approached the Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking
relief regarding the filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms for claiming Transitional
I...